Strategic + Organizational Alignment
    << back to Service Offering

Appendix I

 

 

Service Offering Details

 

Below we offer some details within areas of your technology organization we can evaluate. Use this to help identify places where Inventivity should focus our attention.

1. Project Management and Implementation

Our project management review includes four major areas to evaluate the team's ability to succeed on projects:

  • Execution — Can the team complete projects on time / on budget / with required features?
  • Tracking — Can the team measure and understand the status of projects internally to help balance efforts and stay on schedule?
  • Communicating/Reporting — Can the team accurately describe the project status to the rest of the business?
  • Learning — Does the team learn from completed projects and have a documented project methodology that is constantly improved?

2. Systems and Platforms

Learning about your systems and platforms falls into four categories:

  • Openness / Flexibility - Will this platform serve foreseeable business needs into future?  Are you tied to specific vendors?
  • Status of Internal Technology - Is the hardware and software you have developed robust and well-understood?
  • Interfaces - Is the system well-partitioned, are the interfaces well-built and well-documented?
  • Scalability - Does the team understand the current limits of the platform and have a plan for increasing its capabilities?

[top of page]

3. Processes

There are four topics for critical processes in the technology group:

  • Vendor relationships - How do you select / work with / evaluate / replace your technology partners?
  • Operational processes - How do you measure and improve operationally?
  • Support processes - How do you address need for changes / fixes / real-time requests from the business?
  • Hiring - How successful is your approach to hiring?  Do you evaluate quality and speed of the process?

4. Development Environment

Once development has begun, it's important to examine its performance.  We categorize our review of the health of the environment as follows:

  • Methodology - How would the team describe the approach to development?
  • Internal Technology Status - What's the quality of the existing technology base?
  • Documentation and Reviews - How usable is the current documentation, what's the process for creating it going forward?
  • Bug tracking - How is this managed and fit into the overall development environment?
  • Productivity and other metrics - Do you know how productive you are relative to similar teams and efforts?

[top of page]

5. Operational

  • Risk minimization - What tools do you have in place to evaluate risk? How do you track risk? Where do you accept the most risk? The least??
  • Disaster planning - What would you do if your data center was destroyed?
  • Security - How do you monitor for and prevent breaches from outside your system? What policies and procedures do you have in place to ensure internal security?
  • Reliability and monitoring — How reliable is your technology? How do you measure its reliability and compare it to goals and your competitors?

6. Culture

Evaluating culture is by necessity filled with intangibles.  We're not simply counting ping-pong tables here; any useful evaluation is far more nuanced - however we have homed in on some specific axes along which we can usefully evaluate "culture":

  • Job satisfaction / retention - Is the team happy and committed?
  • Performance tracking - Do you know how well the team is performing and more importantly, do they?
  • Team communication - What are the typical types and frequency of team communications? Is this effective?
  • Work environment - Are the team members appreciated and provided with a productivity-enhancing workplaces?

[top of page]

7. Relationship to the business

We focus on four major yardsticks to judge the relationship between technology and the business:

  • Project creation - What are the requirements? How are they mapped to business cases?
  • Processes - What tools and interactions exist to view and manage projects in terms of business goals?
  • Organization — What is the state of the hierarchical and interpersonal fit to the business? How are both formal reporting structure and informal work relationships?
  • Financial - What budgeting and other financial information is flowing in and out of the technology group?

8. Comparative Technology Assessment

  • Current research — What is the state of the art for your key technologies in industry and in academia?
  • Current competition — How sophisticated are your competitors? Do their platform decisions differ significantly from yours?
  • Idealized competition — What is possible in your industry currently?
  • Related industries — What is possible in related industries that may be quickly adapted to your firm?

[top of page]